Tether and Bitfinex Dragged In Amended Class Action Lawsuit

Stablecoin issuer Tether and Bitfinex are being dragged in a new Class Action Lawsuit that was filed with an amendment
By Godfrey Benjamin
Updated April 25, 2025

Highlights

  • Tether and Bitfinex are facing an amended Class Action Lawsuit
  • The duo are being accused of market manipulation trading activities
  • The stablecoin issuer has always been on the radar for related controversial claims

Stablecoin issuer Tether and cryptocurrency exchange Bitfinex have been caught up in an amended class action lawsuit. Both firms are currently facing allegations bordering on market manipulation.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Recent Tether And Bitfinex Case Comes With 3 Cause Actions

In a recent filing with the United States District Court Southern District of New York, Tether and Bitfinex were accused of market manipulation and violation of antitrust laws. To put it in perspective, the two crypto companies are accused of violating the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA) via market manipulation, monopolization, and agreement in restraint of trade.

The lawsuit was brought upon them by Matthew Script, Benjamin Leibowitz, Jason Leibowitz, Aaron Leibowitz, and Pinchas Goldshtein, who were all named “Plaintiffs” in the suit. The latest filing is a new, slimmed-down second complaint that is part of an ongoing class action lawsuit.

As seen in the filing, Tether and its sister crypto exchange “executed a sophisticated scheme to fraudulently inflate the price of crypto commodities, a class of crypto-assets that includes bitcoin.” Tether allegedly achieved this by pushing its USD-backed stablecoin USDT into the crypto market while not fully backed.

By doing this, it created the illusion of increased cryptocurrency demand in the market. Thereby, “facilitating trading of [cryptocurrencies] on credit and loaned funds” and ultimately driving up crypto prices. This follows two initial legal complaints filed in the same case; the first one was in 2019  and an amended crypto lawsuit followed the next year. They were both overseen by U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla.

While the first compliant contained eight causes of action, the amended copy held twelve causes of actions. This further confirming that the most recent iteration is a slimmed version.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Original Counsel Removed in Tether Suit

Overall, this particular lawsuit has faced several drawbacks in the past. These includes the removal of crypto law firm Roche Freedman originally representing the plaintiffs.

The removal comes off as necessary after unsavory video recordings of cryptocurrency lawyer Kyle Roche leaked. Roche doubles as the founder of the law firm made it way to the public two years ago. Precisely, Roche was seen admitting to filing frivolous lawsuits to help his clients win cases in these videos. This tested how genuine he was as a supposed law upholder.

Meanwhile, the latest suit claims that there are chat and deposition logs from the companies’ operators, allegedly admitting to manipulative actions.

Notably, a Tether spokesperson has made it clear that the claims in the second amended complaint has no merit.

Read More: Elon Musk X Records Major User Growth Milestone

Advertisement
Godfrey Benjamin
Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture. Follow him on X, Linkedin
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.